Jules Marie vs Matteo Viola Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L L L L L L
Form
L L L L L W L W L LH2H: Marie 1 - 0 Viola
They have played 3 sets in total, with Marie winning 2 and Viola winning 1. The last match between Marie and Viola was at the Cherbourg Challenger, 12-02-2020, Second, I.hard with Jules Marie getting the victory 6-3 3-6 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jules Marie | 1 |
| Matteo Viola | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Jules Marie
Player
Matteo Viola
67%
(
72 of
108)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
102)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
43 of
72)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
50%
(
54 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
107
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 15 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:10:43 | Average Match Time | 2:10:43 |
| 67% (72/108) | 1st Serve % | 71% (72/102) |
| 56% (40/72) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (43/72) |
| 39% (14/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (10/30) |
| 53% (8/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 73% (8/11) |
| 48% (49/102) | Return Points Win % | 50% (54/108) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jules Marie Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Jules Marie
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
50
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Millen Hurrion
Player
Jules Marie
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
11
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Jules Marie
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Jules Marie
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
August Holmgren
Player
Jules Marie
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
26 of
38)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Rocha
Player
Jules Marie
62%
(
53 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jules Marie
Player
Goncalo Marques
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Jules Marie
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jules Marie
Player
Mark Ceban
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Jules Marie
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
34 of
71)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo Viola Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Matteo Viola
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Matteo Viola
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Omar Giacalone
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Matteo Viola
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Pavel Nejedly
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Matteo Viola
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Matteo Viola
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Matteo Viola
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
11
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
Player
Matteo Viola
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
66 of
113)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (384/224) | Win/Loss | 53% (563/490) |
| 61% (836/541) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1293/1169) |
| 54% (6864/5839) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (11695/11015) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 777 | Aces Total | 1006 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 599 | Total Double Faults | 2685 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:1:45 |
| 551.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 568.96 |
| 69% (14709/21303) | 1st Serve % | 66% (32316/49106) |
| 66% (9733/14709) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (20444/32316) |
| 50% (3273/6594) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (7794/16790) |
| 44% (1024/2340) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2453/5479) |
| 41% (9142/22036) | Return Points Win % | 43% (20688/48079) |
| 63% (379/600) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (554/1036) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (3/9) |
| 57% (87/153) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (138/268) |
| 57% (96/168) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (186/355) |
| 91% (373/339) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (539/450) |
| 9% (373/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (539/88) |
| 19% (234/44) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (514/112) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
